California law doesn’t ban threatening gestures

A man enters data into a computer in London in 2015. (Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg)

So the California Supreme Court held yesterday (People v. Gonzalez), interpreting Cal. Penal Code § 422 — a statute that applies to statements “made verbally, in writing, or by means of an electronic communication device.” “[M]anually simulat[ing] a pistol pointed upward,” the court concluded, wasn’t “verbal[]” (and wasn’t claimed to be written or electronic). “[W]e need not resolve here whether ‘made verbally’ requires either the use of words or an oral utterance. Because defendant’s conduct here involved neither, we conclude it falls outside the purview of section 422.”

The court noted that, “Our conclusion is based on the manner in which the statute is drafted. Should the Legislature choose to include symbolic gestures within the ambit of section 422, it remains free to do so.” And indeed, just as symbolic expression is generally tantamount to verbal expression for purposes of constitutional protection, so it could equally be restricted if it falls within a First Amendment exception (such as for true threats of criminal behavior). But given the current text of § 422, I think the court was right to say that California law does not currently cover nonverbal symbolic threats.

Originally Found On: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/06/02/california-law-doesnt-ban-threatening-gestures/

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s