Indiana: Ban on broadcasting trials doesn’t bar live-tweeting

So an Indiana judicial ethics commission opined in an opinion that was posted on Westlaw:

Rule 2.17 of the Code of Judicial Conduct requires judges to prohibit the broadcast of court proceedings except under a narrow set of exceptions. … The Commission’s view is that microblogging, tweeting, or electronically relaying a written message does not constitute broadcasting under Rule 2.17, unless the transmitted message contains video or audio of court proceedings or a link to videotaped court testimony.

I leave to others the question of whether outright broadcasting of trials should be allowed, but I thought this interpretation of what counts as “broadcast[ing]” in the Twitter age was interesting (and, I think, correct).

Originally Found On:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s